Next Up In The Subpoena Line: PROMISES REHAB FACILITY
Oh, that Kevin, he’s after it. He’s totally after it, and he may totally get it, and if only we knew what “it” was, we’d be sitting pretty. See, the thing is that we don’t know if Kevin just wants more of Britney’s money - like he thinks that he’s ENTITLED to it, or something? - or if he actually cares about his children and wants THEM. Or maybe both? Why hasn’t he tried to get custody of the children he had with Shar Jackson, if fatherhood is suddenly so important to him?
That’s what I want to know.
Anyway, so now Kevin’s attorneys have served an executive administrator of Promises Rehab Facility (the facility where Britney stayed for one month back in February and March 2007) with a subpoena. I don’t about Britney, but I’m expecting that SOMETIME SOON (hint, hint, Britney) she should probably set her legal team into action. We’re waaaiiitttinnnggggg, but it doesn’t seem that Britney is doing anything about Kevin’s aggressive custody plan.
READ MORE
People magazine reports:
While Kevin Federline parties in Vegas, his defense team has struck again, delivering a subpoena to the rehabilitation facility attended by his ex Britney Spears. Federline’s lawyer, Mark Vincent Kaplan, confirms that Promises Treatment Center was served with a subpoena Saturday morning, saying, “An executive administrator from Promises rehab facility was served with a subpoena.?
This is the fourth subpoena doled out by the Federline team in the singer’s increasingly high-profile custody battle. Earlier in the week, Spears’s former assistant Shannon Funk, bodyguard Daimon Shippen and pal Alli Sims were all served with legal papers.
“Kevin and his attorneys Mark Vincent Kaplan and James Simon are on a mission,? says a source familiar with the proceedings. “They are pursuing all relevant evidence from every potential source and every available witness.?
A spokesperson from Promises refused to comment, saying: “This is a confidential facility and we cannot comment.? The pop star spent a month at Promises and was released on March 21. Her manager at the time said she was “successfully? released.
According to Pepperdine University law professor Steven M. Cron, the Federline camp is clearly seeing how Spears took to the Promises stint. “Strategically I don’t think they are concerned with the treatment, but how she responded to that treatment,? says Cron. “Specifically, if she participated as she was supposed to. Did she have a positive attitude, did she complete it successfully. Or was she a screw up??
Britney Spears, Britney, Spears, britney-spears, kevin federline, custody battle, law, legal, kfed, k-fed, jayden james, sean preston, celebrity, celebrities
August 20th, 2007 at 9:38 am
Man alive this is getting ugeely
August 20th, 2007 at 3:46 pm
I hope they turn him down. No one has proven she does or ever really did have a true substance abuse problem. Makes you wonder if he wasn’t planning this even when he practically forced her to go.
August 20th, 2007 at 5:13 pm
[...] READ MORE (more…) [...]
August 22nd, 2007 at 12:31 am
You’ve got to wonder though if she’s just given up. I mean, she KNOWS she is being watched, but she is not showing the kind of behavior expected of a mother trying to win over a jury of her peers - or a judge.
August 24th, 2007 at 5:07 pm
Okay, I would assume that the rehab center has confidentiality rights and won’t have anything interesting to say, so why subpoena them unless just to prove that she sought rehab (if they’ll even acknowledge that she was a patient)? However, if they do share details I soooo want to read the juicy transcripts!
August 24th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
KD: I think there’s more where this came from.
Marie: Oooooh. Good theory. I’m going to have to brainstorm on that one a little bit.
OMSH: I don’t know that it’s whether she’s given up, or whether she just never had a clue in the first place.
Erica: You’re right - there ARE confidentiality agreements. But I think they’ll ask questions like: was she cooperative in her treatment? was she courteous to the staff? things like that shouldn’t be confidential, in my opinion. But then again, i’m kind of nosy.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:23 pm
[...] MORE (more…) .adHeadline {font: bold 10pt Arial; text-decoration: underline; color: #0000FF;} .adText {font: [...]
August 26th, 2007 at 6:26 pm
[...] if Kevin’s subpoena frenzy isn’t bad enough news in Britney’s life, there are new problems that I suspect will [...]
September 5th, 2007 at 7:26 am
[...] if Kevin’s subpoena frenzy isn’t bad enough news in Britney’s life, there are new problems that I suspect will [...]